Other Sciences

The new framework can increase the rigor and impact of the evaluation of criminal judicial intervention.

Credit: Journal of Experimental Criminology (2024). Doi: 10.1007/S11292-024-024-09650-9

Experimental research is the basis of criminal science, but we agree with strict evidence and use the evidence to determine what works are ongoing. A new article suggests a framework that positions both strict roles and results in the National Justice Research Institute (NIJ) in the US Department of Justice. Social program.

According to her new framework, the more the implementation of the social programs, the more likely it is to have an intentional impact.

“The intentional implementation can enhance the understanding of the factors that make up effective interventions and the factors explaining the results,” he said before NIJ and published an article published in Journal of Experimental Criminology. The criminal scholar Nancy La Vigne says.

“This information is essential for leading policy drafting and program investment through charitable activities,” said La Vigne. “It helps to make a more reliable survey result for the decision -making, increase the possibility of succeeding in duplication, and helps to fill the division from evidence to action.”

The current propulsion of the current debate in criminal science roles is an article by 2023 by Megan Stevenson, a researcher at the University of Boston. Stevenson argued that her strict evaluation, which she defined only as a random comparison test (RCT), often brought null results and was often found to be effective.

Stevenson suggested that the resulting result was to require a systematic change that the criminal judicial system could not be captured by RCT. The crime community reaction has promoted a robust debate on strict roles, definitions, and value in the public forum.

In her article, La Vigne pointed out that the lack of discussion is the importance of researchers and program partners who share the context and quality of the area of ​​criminal justice. Masu. She emphasizes the importance of intentional implementation, which is defined by compliance with the adequacy of the elements that are often dealt with by the evaluation of criminal judicial intervention and the application to local context. Here are the evaluation titanium methods.

La Vigne supports a continuous feed back loop based on a psychologist’s KURT Lewin action research model. In this model, researchers share surveys on the opportunity to improve the frequency of implementation, which is often required due to regional context and other factors. By sharing this information during the evaluation, program implementers can make intermediate corrections and improve the robustness and desirable effects of intervention.

She uses two case studies. One of the honest opportunity observations of the Hawaiian execution program is designed to provide prompt sanctions and specific sanctions for those who have real disability, and the other is the employment opportunity. It is one of the center. Employment programs for people who are re -entering society after the imprisonment in the United States -Measure the adhesion of implementation, modify the middle course, and indicate the importance of adapting the program to local contexts. Promote.

La Vigne concludes that the titanium method emphasizes the need for the subtle understanding of the implementation process and promotes joint evaluation that takes both faithful and local contexts. She recommends that these principles are integrated into a curriculum of criminal science and improving the results of evaluation to promote partnerships between researchers and practitioners.

“The rules of the evaluation titanium are enhanced components that are often overlooked by the current evaluation practices. The focus is on adapting program components to local contexts and ensuring the faithful degree of implementation. Rather than focusing only on the underlying theory

“By doing so, the compliance of the titanium method can promote both successful implementation and successful duplication in all environments for public safety.”

Details: Nancy La Vinnu, Evaluation Titanium method: Improvement of safety and justice intervening and duplication, journal of experimental criminology (2024) (2024). Doi: 10.1007/S11292-024-024-09650-9

Provided by crime and justice research alliance

Quotation: The new framework can increase the strictness and impact of criminal judicial intervention evaluation (2025, January 27) https://phys.org/news/2025-01- Obtained from Framework– Framework-Criminal-Justice .html

This document is subject to copyright. There is no part that is reproduced without writing permission, apart from fair transactions for private research and research purpose. Content is provided only by information.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button